imoprtanti Nell 'last time you worked in both the CCD 27 / 4 that the CDF 11 / 5, in particular with respect to two important points:
1) Adaptation of our Rules of the amendments to the Rules of Faculty University providing for the reduction of the number of appeals per year from 7 to 5;
2) Revision of the criteria for scoring degree of uniformity between the different focusing degree of our Faculty, and at the same course, to 'uniformity of opinion between committees. In past years, in fact, there was some confusion among teachers about the high scores to be assigned due to the fact that these were different between Medicine, Nursing, Physiotherapy ... Also, for example, some committees Medicine (rare) comply with the maximum of 8 points, while others assigned to 10 or more points. Prof. Galli then proposed to make changes in the light of decisions taken at the "National Conference of Presidents of Degree." In particular, the proposals come in the Faculty Council were:
Thesis experimental compilation or a maximum of 8 points (like now)
Assign 2 points to those who graduated in July and October sessions, one for those who graduated in March (now 3 for the first 2:02 to March)
award points for work experience abroad (Erasmus and others), 0.2 points / month (Now 0.1) points per
Give praise in exams 0.2 points / praise (now 0.1)
The assessment must be made by each member based on: mastery of the subject discussed, quality the presentation, evaluation of the methodology, skill in debate
Delete the application from the co
Introducing possibly the external reviewer
Training Commissions (minimum 7 members), including teachers, researchers and prof. Contract
To assign praise is needed a minimum score of 113/110 (enforced by the University Regulations) and unanimity of the Commission.
respect to these issues, such as Medical Students, we have formulated an opinion that we requested for the acts of the Faculty Council. In fact, the letter (attached) was read publicly in the Council by the President and led the discussion that is open.
Results:
- Appeals: as expected, at the time of the vote, the vast majority of teachers voted to adjust to five appeals, then next year the minimum number of calls per year is 5. The principal pointed out, however, all that 5 is only a small number, there will be widely available to add request and appeals in the case that there will be greater control over the distribution of the calls themselves also require more work Coordinators of the semester.
- Thesis: The Dean referred the discussion at the next sitting.
Our final assessment is positive, despite the "defeat" announced on the first point. In fact, there emerged the possibility of starting a work from which we have highlighted in the letter, together with prof. who have recognized the seriousness of our position on what we want from the university (to become good doctors, but especially men, learning from teachers who take seriously our need to learn). In this way, it has proved true once again that the position is more reasonable than to ask what's wrong is not limited the complaint and the complaint.
